
E C H O P A R T N E R S L T D . P e t e r D. Ha r r i s Di r e c tor , Bo ar d S e c r e t ar y P hone : 2 5  -765-8213 E -ma i l : p. ha r r i s@t e lu s . ne t We b s i t e : www. e c h o p a r t n e r s . c a


Sunday, June 15, 2014


Hunter Litigation Chambers

Greg J. Allen, Attorney


Suite 2100 - 1040 West Georgia Street


Vancouver, BC V6E 4H1

Chain of Events Coping with the BC Securities Commission


From June 2013 to February 2014


Dear Greg,



To work with you within the SPYru event, I’m providing you an over-all summary and cronolized sequence of gatherings that appeared although handling the percentage and our subsequent legal action against the commission for conducting a biased and un-legal research towards U-GO Echo and Brand names Partners, for example the slandering of our own Directors.

Sole Grounds for Contacting the Commission



You probably know this, we handled the profit as subjects of Klaus Glusing and this is why, we sought out the fee to support us move officially SPYru Inc. to Canada and help save the SPYru occupant brokers from shedding their investment. Within the subsequent 8 many weeks from my primary exposure to the fee, we totally co-controlled and we voluntary converted over all of the files asked by the payment.

Past and CHAIN of EVENTS


Deception and Misleading Undertakings


William Ting, BCSC Investigator



On June 12, 2013 when I first designed connection with Mr. Ting and with no Mr. Ting requesting, I willingly sent in on the very same day, a 10 website page "Statement of Facts" outlining our business oriented exercises with SPYru Inc. and Klaus Glusing returning to 2010, with this papers we given more information that explains why we were in search of the help of the commission. (See fastened "Statement of Facts" for rapid resource) Ref erenc e: echo  47-08-06 -201 4

2

E C H O P A R T N E R S L T D . P e t e r D. Ha r r i s Di r e c tor , Bo ar d S e c r e t ar y P sharpen : 2 5  -765-8213 E -ma i l : p. ha r r i s@t e lu s . ne t We b s i t e : www. e c h o p a r t n e r s . c a



A few days soon after my very first connection with Mr. Ting, Lorne Cire and I asked for that individuals take a trip at all of our costs to Vancouver and meet with Mr. Ting to spell out how we acquired defrauded by Klaus Glusing and why we were trying to find their support before the profit rendered verdict and begun an investigation.



All things considered, our circumstance is exclusive, being the percentage concurred, and that we did voluntarily solution the commission for help we by no means made an effort to stay clear of our duties together with the percentage.



At the start, my deals with Mr. Ting had been incredibly friendly, courteous as well as on an initial brand schedule. After few weeks of a number of e-email swaps with Mr. Ting, giving an answer to all of his inquiries and entirely co-managing, out of your violet, Mr. Ting pointed out in my experience that I’m to not communicate with him and this I will maintain a securities lawyer.

All things considered this time, I became under the impression that Mr. Ting was seeking all of the information and facts to be able to kind your subject from the make an effort to allow us to protect the resident SPYru investors. In addition, Mr. Ting in no way verified or mentioned in my experience on June 12th or at any down the road time how the commission payment has no authority or expert during the TCI’s and Klaus Glusing. Thus, the commission obtained no objective to assist us in salvaging the citizen buyers through the start. We just learned these details from Ms. Mitchell-Banks on February 14, 2014.


Retained Legal Services


Once we handled the commission payment, we obtained absolutely no reason to consider which we had broken a number of the BC Securities Act, as a result we noticed absolutely no reason to keep an attorney, given that we might reveal ourself towards the fee, which in no way happened.



On July 2013, on and 12 the recommendations of Mr. Ting, we retained the services of Farris Law in Vancouver. From July 2013 to January 2014 our Farris lawyer or attorney possessed many mobile phone talks, e-mails and characters to and with Mr. commission and Ting litigators. Our attorney expected that many of us send out a further 450 docs requested by the payment, subsequently. In January 2014 the payment requested further papers that some of the records asked for got previously been sent to the fee. Ref erenc e: echo  47-08-06 -201 4

3

E C H O P A R T N E R S L T D . P e t e r D. Ha r r i s Di r e c tor , Bo ar d S e c r e t ar y P hone : 2 5  -765-8213 E -ma i l : p. ha r r i s@t e lu s . ne t We b s i t e : www. e c h o p a r t n e r s . c a



The span of time ought to an inspection very last? It would seem to me right after 11 weeks of investigating our event, the fee right now can have recorded formal expenses in opposition to us. Now the percentage is saying: "Allegations have not been shown". That noises to me for instance a weasel statement.



After seven weeks of owning spent some $80K in authorized charges, and noticing we had been no additional into the future with the profit on an beginning deal with, on January 29, 2014, we ignored our lawyer and thought to offer directly using the percentage. Our conclusion was established the commission’s hearing guidebook clearly saying we could characterize ourselves without having attorney offer. We acquired no decision due to the fact we obtained run out of funds by then and that we could not find the money for an attorney or journey to Vancouver.

No Longer Cooperating with all the Commission


Abuse of Power and Intimidation


About the same morning, January 29th we announced for the commission, we might will no longer co-function in the exploration and our explanation was that after all of these many months handling the percentage it had been apparent we would not receive a sensible and unbiased hearing and this is why we want to seem to be ahead of a Supreme Court Judge exactly where we understood we may get a impartial and acceptable seeing and hearing. It was subsequently really clear to us the fact that investigation was rotating off to be abusive and vindictive.



By January 2014, we pointed out that by standing up towards the commission’s allegations, the investigators retaliated by getting to be biased, vindictive, and slanderous from our class. The investigators possessed no justifiable appropriate grounds to order a cease market obtain versus U-Go Brands and Echo Partners this became a clear retaliatory mistreat and relocate of power practiced on the part of the investigators.

Retained Investigating Firm


Klaus Glusing Background Check


We recognized the commission payment was not likely to allow us to, knowing the profit possessed contacted Klaus Glusing and dependant on Klaus Glusing’s letter, the payment got to the conclusion that Klaus Glusing had no effort engaging right with these resident brokers and did not jog the business.



Understanding the profit was neglectful in their exploration of Klaus and Level Glusing, we retained the assistance of Harbor Investigations of Vancouver. We offered the commission payment with reveals that demonstrated we directed emails to Klaus Glusing Ref erenc e: echo  47-08-06 -201 4

4

E C H O P A R T N E R S L T D . P e t e r D. Ha r r i s Di r e c tor , Bo ar d S e c r e t ar y P sharpen : 2 5  -765-8213 E -ma i l : p. ha r r i s@t e lu s . ne t We b s i t e : www. e c h o p a r t n e r s . c a


advocating we switch SPYru Inc. through the TCI and sign-up SPYru in Canada or perhaps the U.S.A.


We also provided confirmation into the percentage that the had not been Klaus Glusing’s novice remaining linked to misappropriation of funds. We offered into the commission details in the Bermuda Supreme Court affirming a couple of judgments to protect against Klaus Glusing totaling approximately USD$4 Million.

The subjects were Cast Lines, a CP Ships business, the second victim was Michael G. DeGroote, a person receiving an order of Canada in addition to a Canadian business owner and philanthropist from Hamilton, Ontario. The third injured person became a property builder in Bermuda. Klaus Glusing left behind Bermuda and relocated to Vancouver to avoid paying back these sufferers.



The payment performed understand about Klaus Glusing ahead of our June 12th contact. Sometime in 2001, Klaus Glusing started off a shipping Line in Vancouver named ValuShip. The profit charged Klaus Glusing of lying to investors, therefore, the commission payment was already conscious of Klaus Glusing’s fraudulent history.


Micro Managing SPYru Inc.


Klaus Glusing



We shipped to the percentage quite a few copies of e-send communications from Klaus Glusing to Lorne Cire and myself instructing us on the way to move forward at the time-to-day management of this company. Reading Klaus Glusing’s mail messages definitely shows that Klaus Glusing was responsible for SPYru Inc.



Lorne Cire plus i were definitely do not ever officials of SPYru Inc. Klaus Glusing was most shareholder following Mark Glusing’s passing-away and Klaus Glusing never disclosed to Lorne or me how many offers he really retained. After several months of utilizing SPYru Inc. and just after Lorne Cire privately invested $5,000.00, Klaus Glusing gifted us a blended 5 zillion conveys and built us Directors with no voting proper rights. Ref erenc e: echo  47-08-06 -201 4

5

E C H O P A R T N E R S L T D . P e t e r D. Ha r r i s Di r e c tor , Bo ar d S e c r e t ar y P sharpen : 2 5  -765-8213 E -ma i l : p. ha r r i s@t e lu s . ne t We b s i t e : www. e c h o p a r t n e r s . c a


Slanderous Misconduct, Mistreat and Accusations of Power


My dealings with Ms. Donders were exactly the same as while using connection I had formerly with Mr. respectful, on and Ting initial label schedule initially, afterwards, converting horrible by Ms. Donders right after few weeks.



I will web site this measures by Ms. Donders we actually feel have been out of range, criminal and definitely show misuse of electrical power.

Known affirmation by Ms. Donders the following: 



1. Telling some of our brokers we had been an against the law organization and shady Directors and that we were definitely gonna be banned once and for all regarding securities trading in BC.



2. Contacting TD Waterhouse Head Office purchasing the very cold from the particular believe in bank accounts of John Thibert and Diane Thibert. Subsequently, when Blair Payton of TD Waterhouse, economic counselor on the Thiberts, Mr. Payton phoned Ms. Donders questioning her measures. Ms. Donders was dictatorial on the way to Mr. Payton and installed inside the phone on him. These believe in credit accounts experienced not a thing to do with the SPYru instance. Subsequently, soon after our powerfully objecting to Ms. Donders steps, a few weeks later the fee elevated the cease market order against the two private have faith in accounts. Ms. Donders’ reckless motion brought about Mr. Thibert to send out her an competitive e-mailbox message that was replied to by Ms. Mitchell-Banks advising Mr. Thibert the commission will not any longer recognize his emails and also that he is to adapt, otherwise the payment will advise law enforcement for taking motion in opposition to him. Subsequently Mr. Thibert struggled a anxious breaking down and contains been beneath physician’s care and attention from that time.



3. Ms. Donders contacted Mr. Thibert’s personalized physician, not seeking professional medical details, but stressful the data. Ms. Donders call was forceful and strenuous how the physician’s assistant was kept distressed and weeping out of the call. These kinds of measures by a public servant is overall unacceptable.



4. On one other function Ms. Donders informed our shareholders that the fee was consuming us to the courtroom, when in simple fact it was actually a voluntary commission payment seeing and hearing she was discussing, so we acquired presently courteously replied that we would not show up at.



Ref erenc e: echo  47-08-06 -201 4

6

E C H O P A R T N E R S L T D . P e t e r D. Ha r r i s Di r e c tor , Bo ar d S e c r e t ar y P sharpen : 2 5  -765-8213 E -ma i l : p. ha r r i s@t e lu s . ne t We b s i t e : www. e c h o p a r t n e r s . c a


Ms. Donders January 2014 Questioning Lorne Cire


Intimidation and Un-legal questioning



The initial Director being interviewed by Ms. Donders was Lorne Cire in January 2014 in Vancouver at Lorne Cire’s personal costs. The moment increased an objection or intervened in Lorne Cire’s safety to any of the questioning by Ms the job interview was really an interrogation and our law firm never. Donders. A few of the information asked for by Ms. Donders was out from lines and against the law to request.

Lorne Cire, RBC Cancelation of Corporate And Personal Accounts Including Bank Cards


Ms. Donders, BCSC Lead Investigator


If Ms. Donders was ideal for doing slanderous accusations against us to our own buyers, God is familiar with what Ms. Donders explained to the Royal Bank about us.


Right after Lorne Cire got a very long and detailed phone talk along with the RBC investigator, weeks later on the RBC notified Lorne Cire that they had cancelled every one of his accounts.All we know>


Lorne Cire had been with RBC for upwards of two decades as a possible excellent prospect with Ms. Donders engagement, Lorne Cire’s organization relationship with all the RBC was severed, the injury is conducted.



Also, Dr. Michael Kwasnek, U-GO Brands Treasurer, gained a notice without reason why, showing that RBC hoped to own no potential dealings with him. Dr. Kwasnek also were built with a prolonged and respected romance with RBC before Ms. Donders involvement.

Misleading Information, Constant Threatening and Abuse of Power


Ms. Teresa R. Mitchell-Banks QC - BCSC Enforcement and Corporate Finance Director


Dealings with Ms. Mitchell-Banks were actually nerve-racking. Ms. Mitchel-Banks demonstrated in her e-postal mail communications that she is not going to appreciate anyone opposite or pondering the commission’s decisions or influence and for that reason should you assess the displays you will appreciate that my communication swaps with Ms. Mitchell-Banks ended up intense on both edges once in a while. Ref erenc e: echo  47-08-06 -201 4

7

E C H O P A R T N E R S L T D . P e t e r D. Ha r r i s Di r e c tor , Bo ar d S e c r e t ar y P sharpen : 2 5  -765-8213 E -ma i l : p. ha r r i s@t e lu s . ne t We b s i t e : www. e c h o p a r t n e r s . c a



Using one special occasion Ms. Mitchel-Banks mailed me a few e-mails among Saturday and Sunday terrifying me with contempt of judge should i failed to turn up in the timetabled listening to. Once she recognized I had been not about to seem, she dispatched me an e-snail mail declaring that, in truth the meeting was voluntary, and I failed to in reality have to turn up.


[[https://www.youtube.com/embed/9BJgYaVpXsM?showinfo=0&modestbranding=1|external frame]]

I even delivered a private meaning to Ms. Mitchell-Banks questioning her to impress are more perception of our problem so we were actually almost while not capital considering that we obtained paid for around YTD $130,000.00 in legitimate rates to our own lawyers plus the commission. Ms. Mitchell-Banks absolutely forgotten about my serious plea being even more comprehending, reveal some concern or try to work alongside us. Rather, she chose to be dictatorial and condescending when it comes to us.



Finally, immediately after managing Ms. Mitchell-Banks for many your five to ten 2 or 3 weeks and her going on holiday getaway, I started to convey with Mark L. Hilford, BCSC Manager, and Litigation.

Misleading Information, Constant Threats and Abuse of Power


Mr. Mark L. Hilford - BCSC Manager, Litigation


My message change with Mr. Hilford lasted 14 days and in most cases was ruthless on edges. Mr. Hilford exhibited the identical negative and condescending mindset when it comes to us and showed no consideration to our predicament.

Aggressive Message to Mr. Ting and Ms. Donders


Peter Harris and John Thibert


Everyone knows the commission uses my content and John Thibert’s to try to show the commissioners that many of us usually are not to become dependable and our conduct is not really satisfactory available planet.



Our protection is always that we certainly have been taken care of like thieves from the beginning so we misplaced our tempers by retaliating with hostile messages. Consequently, each John and personally, directed apology emails to both Ms. Donders and Mr. Ting. Ref erenc e: echo  47-08-06 -201 4

8

E C H O P A R T N E R S L T D . P e t e r D. Ha r r i s Di r e c tor , Bo ar d S e c r e t ar y P sharpen : 2 5  -765-8213 E -ma i l : p. ha r r i s@t e lu s . ne t We b s i t e : www. e c h o p a r t n e r s . c a


Consent to seem in front of an investigator


Travel Everyday and Fees for each Diem



The commission never ever indicated to us they ought to take care of our travel expenditures to go to Vancouver, the one subsidy we acquired out of the profit was really a $20.00 observe day-to-day every diem.



Had we recognized that our charges would have been settled, we may have consented to look for personal questioning.



One of our reasons behind decreasing to show up was we had no capital handy to protect the holiday fees for the whole Directors. On a lot of times, we made it specific to Ms. Mitchell-Banks and Mr. Hilford which we obtained no cash traveling.


When Ms 
. Mitchell-Banks sent back to the [[https://www.owler.com/company/amesecurities|Family Office]] we communicated for one more several weeks and once more factors received intense and Ms. Mitchell-Banks directed me that this percentage will no more recognize my e-email communications or calls. Mr. Mitchell-Banks made it really clear that we will need to maintain a Securities Attorney or else issues are going to deteriorate for us.

Exemplary and Punitive Damages


Reckless Practice with the Commission


U-GO Echo and Models Partners were shaped in April 2014 and many types of U-GO Brands Subscription Agreements and other connected paperwork have been developed and submitted towards the payment by Farris Law. So far the commission payment has not contacted Farris Law to indicate U-GO Brands is at severe breach of the Securities Act.

Corporate and Product Restructuring



Due to disaster of SPYru, we have now observed our selves being required to recreate our main system from "SPYru Uberwater" that was unsuccessful out there put on account of chemical substance written content that consumers not any longer desired to buy.



Realizing we simply had to build an all-natural solution we established a functioning alliance with John Stevens and SuperDrop. Our steps system was according to the project of your cool product start to shield the occupant brokers, hence SuperDrop was made. Ref erenc e: echo  47-08-06 -201 4

9

E C H O P A R T N E R S L T D . P e t e r D. Ha r r i s Di r e c tor , Bo ar d S e c r e t ar y P sharpen : 2 5  -765-8213 E -ma i l : p. ha r r i s@t e lu s . ne t We b s i t e : www. e c h o p a r t n e r s . c a



In the meantime, while we ended up browsing through this metamorphosis and remaining defrauded by Klaus Glusing, we discovered ourself publicly accused and slandered through the commission. Despite most of the downsides around us, we nonetheless had been able get SuperDrop announced and well received through the National Associates and Vendors, YTD, we certainly have made 85,000 bottles of SuperDrop.



Upon your order via the percentage of the the need to stand up-down through the Noor Energy negotiation and other negotiation relating to securities, all several company directors are getting rid of the chance to obtain income for the past 3 years of enthusiasm, hard work, perseverance. Similarly, we are unable to secure our buyers as SuperDrop can no longer advance.



Please visit after that website page demonstrating getting cutbacks above the up coming five years. The predicted earnings and number of retailers are positioned conservatively vs actuals. Ref erenc e: echo  47-08-06 -201 4

10

E C H O P A R T N E R S L T D . P e t e r D. Ha r r i s Di r e c tor , Bo ar d S e c r e t ar y P hone : 2 5  -765-8213 E -ma i l : p.
